The New York Times states that Jordan Peterson is currently the most prominent intellectual in the Western world. His book "12 Rules for Life" has achieved international success. However, those who align with a fundamentalist form of Christianity may not appreciate it as Peterson presents himself as agnostic regarding the existence of God. Similarly, those who are non-religious and do not consider the Bible to be true and timeless, may be irritated by the author's perspective of enduring revelation in the book of Genesis.
It is believed that Peterson's popularity stems from his effort to cater to the concerns and thought processes of those who, coming from a Christian background, still question the religious beliefs of previous generations. Many find his prescribed "rules of life" to be compelling and applicable, however, it is not always clear how they connect to the theology he advocates. Additionally, the book lacks structure and flow, with many ideas appearing to stray from the main topic.
Peterson appears to be more at ease with the concept of "Being" rather than God, and uses this term in a broad manner. He references the spiritual teachings of Emanuel Swedenborg to provide clarity on the idea of the spiritual world being a source of love and wisdom, which can be inverted by human actions to cause the opposite effects. In the book, Peterson argues that the early chapters of Genesis should be read as a metaphor for human psychology rather than historical events. He believes that the story illustrates the tragedy and ethical turmoil of human existence, and the idea of humanity's separation from what he refers to as God and nature, with no possibility of return.
The text goes into further detail about how the author sees Jordan Peterson's ideas, particularly as it pertains to his book "12 Rules for Life." The author notes that Peterson's ideas may not be well-received by those who align with a fundamentalist form of Christianity as he presents himself as agnostic when it comes to the existence of God. Similarly, the author suggests that non-religious readers may find Peterson's perspective on the book of Genesis in the Bible to be irritating, as Peterson sees it as an enduring revelation.
The author states that Peterson's popularity comes from his ability to address the concerns and thought processes of those who come from a Christian background but question the religious beliefs of previous generations. The author finds the "rules of life" that Peterson prescribes to be useful and applicable, but notes that it is not always clear how they relate to the theology Peterson advocates. Furthermore, the author finds that the book lacks structure and flow, with many ideas appearing to wander off in different directions.
The author also touches upon Peterson's comfort level with the concept of "Being" rather than God and how he uses this term in a broad manner. The author references the spiritual teachings of Emanuel Swedenborg to provide clarity on this concept and how it relates to the idea of the spiritual world being a source of love and wisdom, which can be inverted by human actions to cause the opposite effects.
The author also provides a summary of how Peterson interprets the early chapters of Genesis as a metaphor for human psychology rather than historical events and how it illustrates the tragedy and ethical turmoil of human existence and the idea of humanity's separation from what he calls God and nature with no possibility of return.
Overall, it seems the text is written by someone who is interested in Jordan Peterson's ideas, but has some concerns and critiques of his perspective on theology and the way the ideas are presented in the book "12 Rules for Life."
Post a Comment for "12 Rules for Life - Book Review Jordan Peterson"